Decisions capable of destroying economies—or civilization itself—can proceed without any reliable demonstration that the governed understood and authorized them.
Decisions about the foreign and military policy of the United States have persisted across elections, repeatedly increasing military expenditures as the population has doubled and tripled ss domestic needs and economic costs of war have grown.
Escalation of warfare in the middle east could culminate in nuclear winter, with billions of deaths.
Yet the public that bears responsibility for these decisions doesn’t understandsthe policies nor has it had the opportunity to authorize them.
Why are SOME people rewarded?
WHOM do we listen to and why?
For WHOM are we a credit rating?
Is there power in knowledge?
What does success mean?
WHY ELON MUSK?
WHY RICHARD NIXON?
WHY J.D. VANCE, JOE BIDEN, SYLVESTER STALLONE?
FAILURE OF DMOCRACY IS A GLOBAL RISK
BECAUSE WE REWARD CLIMATE CHANGE
NUCLEAR WARFARE
ASSASSINATION
GENOCIDE, WILD FIRES, HURRICANES AND FAMINE
SOLUTIONS TO GLOBAL PROBLEMS
DO NOT REQUIRE GLOBAL AUTHORITY
THEY REQUIRE LOCAL ACTION
When any government can take a population toward nuclear war without being able to demonstrate informed public consideration and authorization, the distinction between holding elections and democracy stops being theoretical.
GLOBAL SOLUTIONS
DOESN’T MEAN GLOBAL AUTHORITY
Global outcomes are the product of local actions
On your community’s platform
Problems, ideas, concerns
Personal experience
Find common interests
Challenge assumptions
Find out what holds up
Negotiate
Challenge
Propose
A collective voice
Coordinate resources
CAN converts the dispersed capacities of individuals into the organized democratic power of a community.
CAN gives communities a continuing process through which people can:
Much of philanthropy follows a familiar structure:
Funders identify a problem.
Organizations design an intervention.
Institutions allocate resources.
People receive services.
Success is measured in beneficiaries reached.
This can relieve suffering.
But it leaves the distribution of power unchanged.
DEVELOPERS WANT TO BUILD 9 HIGHRISE TOWERS WITH 1600 UPSCALE APARTMENTS, AND A HOTEL AND SHOPPING MALL
Water & energy outages are already frequent
Traffic is already intolerable
RESIDENTS ARE OBJECTING
THE COMMUNITY ISN’T ORGANIZED
The community remains inside the process the development system already knows how to defeat: hearings, objections, petitions, scattered evidence, procedural delay and exhaustion.
Homes can become affordable.
Childcare can be organized.
Parks can be protected.
Local economies thrive
NO ADS – NO PERSONAL DATA COLLECTION
ALIGNING LOCAL ACTION
FOR GLOBAL IMPACT

CAN’s architecture does not assume that today’s human institutions, today’s internet, or today’s electromagnetic communications represent the final form of intelligent relationship.
Human communication has already moved from speech, writing and print to electronic and global digital networks. Physics may eventually reveal forms of communication we do not presently understand. Artificial intelligence is already creating relationships with forms of intelligence that are not human.
CAN is not designed around a particular communications technology. It is an architecture through which autonomous intelligences can understand one another, establish identity and provenance, determine what can be trusted
negotiate relationships and boundaries, establish consent, coordinate consequential action and preserve autonomy.
HUMAN DEMOCRATIC COMMUNITIES ARE THE FIRST APPLICATION
Communications infrastructure through which autonomous intelligences can understand one another, establish legitimate relationships, and coordinate consequential action without surrendering their autonomy.
Today, this begins with geographically bounded human communities.