THIS MEDIUM IS AN INSTITUTION FOR CIVILIZATION

From speech and song to writing, reading and print, to global digital networks.

Physical science has revealed new ways of communicating not previously imagined

Human relationships mediated by machine intelligence

 WE ARE PRODUCTS OF OUR CIVILIZATION

MEDIA IS POLITICAL- IT SHAPES PERCEPTIONS

By selecting, arranging, and representing reality

THE MEDIA WE EXPERIENCE SHAPES OUR PERCEPTIONS

THE MEDIUM IS EVOLVING

Media does not merely transmit independently existing opinions. By selecting, editing, embellishing, arranging and representing views of circumstances, media informs how we feel about what we perceive, anticipates our questions-what seems imaginable and ultimately our values and views of each other and our communities.

COMMUNITIES ARE TECHNOLOGIES FOR CIVILIZATION

THE MEDIUM IS A POLITICAL INSTITUTION

The existing medium we are using creates a world in which governments formulate assessments and proposals to which the governed population is asked to react.

Within this structure, processes of review, hearings, laws and regulations, surveys, public comment, and elections appear to be the machinery of democracy.

(Start with an institutionally created agenda→give individuals opportunities to react→call the result democracy)

THAT IS NOT DEMOCRACY

Democracy exists when an inclusively constituted community, adequately informed about consequential shared circumstances, can form and express authentic collective authorization of public power.

*THE MEDIUM (NOT THE MEDIA) IS THE MESSAGE*

THE MESSAGE IS NOT

POVERTY-AFFLUENCE-HUNGER

CLIMATE CHANGE-WAR-PANDEMIC 

VULNERABILITY–EARTHQUAKE-TORNADO

INFLATION-CORRUPTION-INCOMPETENCE

KNOWLEDGE-IGNORANCE-STUPIDITY

THE MESSAGE IS THAT POLITICAL CIRCUMSTANCES JUST HAPPEN

But they don’t.

They are produced by human action, institutions, incentives, and power—and therefore can be changed

*THE MESSAGE*

WHO YOU ARE – WHAT YOU WILL BECOME

YOUR OPTIONS

WHOM YOU CAN TRUST – WHY

 THE MEDIA YOU ARE PRESENTED IS NOT THE WORLD

BUT REPRESENTATIONS OF THE WORLD

The current population of the Americas—North America, Central America, the Caribbean, and South America—is approximately 1,062,000,000

(BUT AVAILABLE FOR YOU, ONLY IN YOUR IMAGINATION)

WE ARE 8,314,913,500 HIGHLY DIVERSE, EQUALLY HUMAN LIVES

WE LIVE IN 2.5 TO 4.3 MILLION GEOGRAPHIC COMMUNITIES

WE SPEAK AROUND 7,200 DIFFERENT LANGUAGES

THE UNITED NATIONS RECOGNIZES 193 NATION STATES

MEDIA SHAPES YOUR EXPERIENCE

(MEDIA INFORMS YOUR BELIEFS)

Every image, headline, number, story, clip and sequence is produced

THE MESSAGE IN THE MEDIUM

IS NOT IN THE CONTENT

IT’S IN THE ALGORITHMS

YOU MAY LISTEN

YOU MAY SPEAK

YOU WILL NOT BE HEARD

ALGORITHMS SORT YOUR THOUGHTS

RECORD YOUR ATTENTION

TO PRESENT THE NEXT THING YOU SEE

THEREBY-INFORMING WHAT YOU KNOW

MEDIA CREATES ILLUSIONS 

*PAY TO PLAY*

THIS CIVIC MEDIUM WE ARE NOW USING SUBSTITUTES AGGREGATED REACTIONS TO INSTITUTIONALLY CREATED AGENDAS FOR POLITICAL WILL.

Why are some rewarded?

Whom do we listen to-why?

What is success?

Our institutional medium substitutes public reaction to  institutionally created agendas for political will.

Authentic political will originates in an informed community that forms and expresses the collective authorization of its public power.

Who Authorizes Public Power in a Democracy?

WHO DECIDES WHICH FACES CYCLE IN YOUR MEDIA?

WHO OWNS

THE AGGREGATE WEALTH OF THE  NATION?

WHO DECIDES WHAT FACES ARE REPEATED?

ELON MUSK-PETER THEIL-HARVEY WEINSTEIN-BIBI NETENYAHU-RICHARD NIXON-J.D. VANCE-JOE BIDEN, SYLVESTER STALLONE-NICOLE KIDMAN

WHAT ALGORITHMS ARE INFORMING YOUR DESIRE?

MANIPULATING YOUR EMOTIONS

FOR WHAT PURPOSE?

TO WHAT END?

HOW WE PERCEIVE REALITY IS SHAPED BY MEDIA

HOWEVER, IF THE MEDIUM IS THE MESSAGE

THE MESSAGE IS THAT YOUR REALITY IS A NARRATIVE

THAT SOMEBODY OR NOBODY IS WRITING

(PERHAPS AN ALGORITHM)

GLOBAL ONLINE PLATFORMS

ARE CONTROLLED BY DIGITAL CODE

THEY HAVE NO MORAL CODE

THERE ARE NO ETHICAL STANDARDS

THERE IS NO ACCOUNTABILITY

 

IS THAT A PROBLEM?

POSSIBLY NOT FOR MR. ZUCKERBERG

IRONICALLY PERHAPS

TO CHANGE CIRCUMSTANCES

(MAY NOT BE ABOUT MEDIA CONTENT AT ALL)

*REQUIRES THAT WE RE-DESIGN THE MEDIUM*

The Institutional medium is a structure for civic action

But who defines the problem? Who establishes what is true? Who develops the alternatives? Who forms the judgment? Who authorizes the exercise of consequential power?

Many consequential circumstances presented as reality are produced through human institutions and decisions, while the existing civic medium leaves the public principally in the role of observer and reactor rather than author.

What has the public understood and authorized about the national debt?

THE NATIONAL DEBT  EXCEEDS $40 TRILLION

YIELD ON A 10-YEAR US TREASURY NOTE IS 5.01%

WE ARE PAYING

$1,000,000,000,000/year

INTEREST ON THE NATIONAL DEBT 

Who authorized the risks of nuclear escalation?

 AND WE FORGET TO ASK

WHAT DO WE WANT?

WAR — CLIMATE — FAMINE — PUBLIC DEBT — DEVELOPMENT

DECISIONS ARE BEING MADE
CONSEQUENCES ARE BEING PRODUCED

WHAT HAVE WE UNDERSTOOD?
WHAT HAVE WE AUTHORIZED?

 

AND WHAT DO WE WANT?

PUBLIC CIRCUMSTANCES ARE PRODUCED BY HUMAN ACTION

THEY ARE NOT CREATED BY A GLOBAL AUTHORITY

When a government takes a nation to the brink of nuclear war without informed public consideration and authorization, the definition of democracy isn’t theoretical.

 

THE GREATER THE CONSEQUENCE OF PUBLIC POWER,
THE GREATER THE REQUIREMENT FOR INFORMED PUBLIC AUTHORIZATION.

GLOBAL PROBLEMS ARE NOT CREATED BY A GLOBAL GOVERNMENT

GLOBAL CONDITIONS EMERGE FROM LOCAL AND INSTITUTIONAL ACTION

PUBLIC CIRCUMSTANCES ARE SHAPED BY HUMAN ACTION

Not by one actor.
Not always intentionally.
Not always controllably.

Public policy, investment, regulation, development, consumption, military action, infrastructure and institutional priorities shape consequences.

THE MEDIUM HAS MADE THE PUBLIC AN OBSERVER AND REACTOR RATHER THAN AN AUTHOR.
THE MESSAGE IS THAT POLITICAL CIRCUMSTANCES JUST HAPPEN.

CHANGING THE MEDIUM 

 CHANGES THE RULES OF THE GAME

RESTORING DEMOCRACY

Instead of decisions made without public input, with people everywhere quietly terrified or occasionally protesting.

 

WITH A MEDIUM THAT REFLECTS OUR INFORMED PERSPECTIVES AND COLLECTIVE JUDGMENT

AND A DESIGN THAT EVOLVES WITH US AS WE GROW

*POLITICS IS LOCAL*

 TO REFLECT WHAT AND WHO WE ARE

THE MEDIUM MUST BE INCLUSIVE

DEMOCRACY IS NOT PUBLIC POWER EXERCISED WITHOUT THE INFORMED AUTHORIZATION OF THE GOVERNED

DEMOCRACY REQUIRES AUTHENTIC CONSENSUS
(verifiable agreement with disagreement preserved)

IN A TRUE DEMOCRACY COMMUNITIES ARE AUTONOMOUS

 In autonomous communities people set their own priorities

CHANGING THE GAME

WE ARE ON THE CUSP OF INTENTIONALLY DESIGNING

A NEW POLITICAL MEDIUM

Not merely creating more exciting content

An information environment through which people in autonomous communities understand reality, form judgment, establish relationships, and coordinate action.

The existing medium begins with institutions and organizes public reaction.

CAN is not merely giving people a better way to participate in the existing civic medium.

CAN changes who authors political reality.

CAN begins with the community and provides the infrastructure through which the community can understand circumstances, form judgment, establish authentic political will, authorize action, and coordinate power.

*COORDINATED ACTION NETWORKS*

*CAN*

A DELIBERATELY DESIGNED MEDIUM 

WITH CAN 

You just have to show up

On your community’s platform

Look and listen

Problems, ideas, concerns
Personal experience

Interact NATURALLY

Find common interests
Challenge assumptions

 Question information

Find out what holds up

Define NEW actions

Negotiate
Challenge
Propose

Build consensus

A collective voice

AUTHORIZE collective action

Coordinate resources

AND REMEMBER SALIENT THINGS

USE COMMUNITY RESOURCES AND TALENT

With a MEDIUM that connects people with knowledge, relationships, tools, money and resources, and authority derived from inclusive democratic decision-making.

*COORDINATED ACTION NETWORKS*

TECHNOLOGY FOR DEMOCRATIC INFRASTRUCTURE

A process through which people

share reliable information;

trade experiences and goods

identify uncertainties;

examine objectives, alternatives, risks, and consequences;

aggregate power

hear different points of view;

make agreements; define differences; create boundaries;

authorize common priorities, and set limits;

Coordinate resources and action;

preserve commitments and public records; and

hold institutions and representatives accountable

LIFE-SAVING COORDINATION IN EMERGENCIES

maintain communication
coordinate volunteers
communities support others

share vital resources
facilitate government efforts

WHAT HELP MEANS

Historically, philanthropy follows a familiar structure:

Funders identify a problem.
Organizations design an intervention.
Institutions allocate resources.
People receive services.
Success is measured in beneficiaries reached.

Relieving suffering does not change who holds the power to make consequential decisions

 iNDEPENDENT COLLECTIVE ACTION

CAN is not principally an intervention delivered to underserved people.

CAN is infrastructure through which people cease to occupy the institutional category of “underserved beneficiaries.”

CAN participants define the problem, establish what is true, determine priorities, make consequential choices, coordinate resources, and hold institutions accountable.

PLAYAS DE TIJUANA

DEVELOPERS WANT TO BUILD 9 HIGHRISE TOWERS WITH 1600 UPSCALE APARTMENTS, AND A HOTEL AND SHOPPING MALL

IN A CONSERVATION AREA

Water & energy outages are already frequent

Traffic is already intolerable

RESIDENTS ARE OBJECTING

THE COMMUNITY ISN’T ORGANIZED

The community remains inside the process the development system already knows how to defeat: hearings, objections, petitions, scattered evidence, procedural delay and exhaustion.

A colonial relationship does not require malicious intent.

COLONIAL ADMINISTRATION exists whenever the authority to define problems, determine priorities, allocate resources and judge success remains outside the community, while the people living with the consequences are treated primarily as recipients of decisions made on their behalf.

Food, housing, healthcare, education and emergency assistance are essential.

But charity is not self-government

A community should not have to remain powerless in order to qualify for help.

CAN makes collective agency itself the infrastructure

When we have a say in development decisions

Development is sustainable

  When communities can sustain themselves 

WHEN GLOBAL COOLING  IS INDEPENDENTLY ACTIONABLE

Climate change is global, but actions that produce—or reverse—it are local

 Communities must therefore be actors, not beneficiaries

 Community consensus drives coordinated action

Homes can be affordable

Communities can be livable

Childcare can support parents

Parks can be preserved

Local economies can thrive

Government decisions can serve the governed

What people agree on—right now, moving the world

CAN’s architecture does not assume that today’s human institutions, today’s internet, or today’s electromagnetic communications represent the final form of intelligent relationship.

THE MEDIUM IS EVOLVING

CAN is not designed around any particular communications technology. CAN is an architecture through which autonomous communities can understand themselves, build consensus, create wealth, carry out plans, create shared identity and document provenance, negotiate relationships and boundaries, establish consent, coordinate consequential action and preserve autonomy.

COORDINATED ACTION NETWORKS

TECHNOLOGY FOR A CIVILIZED NEW MEDIUM

 

Communications infrastructure through which  individuals can cooperate and establish legitimate relationships and coordinate consequential action without surrendering their autonomy.

CAN is beginning with geographically-bounded human communities–not as a limit, but as a way to understand how a medium empowers the future..

 

Own Your Government

COORDINATED ACTION NETWORKS


Civilization has developed media through which institutions perceive, organize and act upon populations.
CAN reverses that architecture: it is a medium through which communities perceive their own circumstances, form authentic collective judgment, authorize consequential action, and exercise power without surrendering their autonomy.
The problem is not that people lack a voice.

The problem is that the medium does not give the community the capacity to become an author.
CAN creates the civic architecture; cloud and LLM technologies greatly expand what that architecture can do.

Learn about the proposed demonstration

Bring this to your community