Decisions capable of destroying economies—or civilization itself—can proceed without any reliable demonstration that the governed understood and authorized them.
Decisions about the foreign and military policy of the United States have persisted across elections, repeatedly increasing military expenditures as the population has doubled and tripled ss domestic needs and economic costs of war have grown.
Escalation of warfare in the middle east could culminate in nuclear winter, with billions of deaths.
Yet the public that bears responsibility for these decisions doesn’t understandsthe policies nor has it had the opportunity to authorize them.
Why are SOME people rewarded?
WHOM do we listen to and why?
For WHOM are we a credit rating?
Is there power in knowledge?
What does success mean?
FAILURE OF DEMOCRACY IS A GLOBAL RISK
WE REWARD CLIMATE CHANGE
NUCLEAR WARFARE
ASSASSINATION
GENOCIDE, WILD FIRES, HURRICANES AND FAMINE
GLOBAL PROBLEMS
DO NOT RESULT FROM GLOBAL AUTHORITY
THEY RESULT FROM LOCAL ACTION
When any government can take a population toward nuclear war without being able to demonstrate informed public consideration and authorization, the distinction between holding elections and democracy stops being theoretical.
On your community’s platform
Problems, ideas, concerns
Personal experience
Find common interests
Challenge assumptions
Find out what holds up
Negotiate
Challenge
Propose
A collective voice
Coordinate resources
To give communities a continuing process through which people can:
establish reliable information;
identify assumptions and uncertainties;
examine objectives, alternatives, risks, and consequences;
hear different experiences and points of view;
determine what they agree on;
authorize priorities and limits;
Coordinate resources and action;
preserve commitments and public records; and
hold institutions and representatives accountable
Much of philanthropy follows a familiar structure:
Funders identify a problem.
Organizations design an intervention.
Institutions allocate resources.
People receive services.
Success is measured in beneficiaries reached.
But relieving suffering does not necessarily change who holds the power to make consequential decisions.
DEVELOPERS WANT TO BUILD 9 HIGHRISE TOWERS WITH 1600 UPSCALE APARTMENTS, AND A HOTEL AND SHOPPING MALL
Water & energy outages are already frequent
Traffic is already intolerable
RESIDENTS ARE OBJECTING
THE COMMUNITY ISN’T ORGANIZED
The community remains inside the process the development system already knows how to defeat: hearings, objections, petitions, scattered evidence, procedural delay and exhaustion.
It exists whenever the authority to define problems, determine priorities, allocate resources and judge success remains outside the community, while the people living with the consequences are treated primarily as recipients of decisions made on their behalf.
CAN makes collective agency itself the infrastructure
Homes can be affordable
Communities can be livable
Childcare can support parents
Parks can be preserved
Local economies can thrive

CAN’s architecture does not assume that today’s human institutions, today’s internet, or today’s electromagnetic communications represent the final form of intelligent relationship.
Human communication has already moved from speech, writing and print to electronic and global digital networks. Physics may eventually reveal forms of communication we do not presently understand. Artificial intelligence is already creating relationships with forms of intelligence that are not human.
CAN is not designed around a particular communications technology. It is an architecture through which autonomous intelligences can understand one another, establish identity and provenance, determine what can be trusted
negotiate relationships and boundaries, establish consent, coordinate consequential action and preserve autonomy.
HUMAN DEMOCRATIC COMMUNITIES ARE THE FIRST APPLICATION
Communications infrastructure through which autonomous intelligences can understand one another, establish legitimate relationships, and coordinate consequential action without surrendering their autonomy.
Today, this begins with geographically bounded human communities–not as a limit, but as a beginning.